Naomi Campbell oozed confidence as she put on a daring display at the Acqua Fiuggi & Vogue Italia Dinner in Milan on Friday.

The model, 54, joined a slew of stars in a black corset complete with a floor length sheer dress as she arrived for the annual event.

Showing off her ample bust and slender legs Naomi certainly caught the eye in her racy number complete with bone panelling around the corset’s middle.

She flashed a glimpse of her underwear beneath the semi-sheer skirt and ramped up the glamour in a thick white, fur coat. 

Naomi added height to her 5’10 frame with black pointed heels and accessorised with a chunky choker and diamond rings.

She pulled her dark tresses up into a тιԍнт ponytail with plait detailing and opted for a dewy palette of makeup to showcase her naturally good looks.

Naomi Campbell oozed confidence as she put on a daring display at the Acqua Fiuggi & Vogue Italia Dinner in Milan on Friday

The model, 54, joined a slew of stars in a black corset complete with a floor length sheer dress as she arrived for the annual event

It comes after the mum-of-two stepped out for a shopping spree earlier in the day.

Naomi, who is a mum of two – a daughter, three and son, one – was spotted at Il Gufo children’s store, presumably looking for something for her two kids whilst away.

Naomi has ruled the runway for over four decades and is an ‘icon of diversity’ who broke racial barriers in fashion.

As one of the ‘Big Five’ supermodels of the 1990s, she was also the first Black model to grace the covers of multiple Vogue editions.

Beyond modelling, Naomi is a philanthropist and activist. 

She founded Fashion For Relief in 2005, aiming to raise funds for humanitarian causes by staging runway shows.

However, Naomi was disqualified from being a charity trustee for five years after a watchdog found serious mismanagement of funds at Fashion for Relief, which she founded.

This included using charity funds to pay for her stay at a five-star H๏τel in Cannes, France, as well as spa treatments, room service and cigarettes.

Showing off her ample bust and slender legs Naomi certainly caught the eye in her racy number complete with bone panelling around the corset’s middle

Naomi added height to her 5’10 frame with black pointed heels and accessorised with a chunky choker and diamond ring detailing and opted for a dewy palette of makeup to showcase her naturally good looks

She was one of three of the charity’s trustees to be disqualified as a result of the probe by the Charity Commission, which regulates charities in England and Wales.

At the time, she said she was ‘extremely concerned’ by the regulator’s findings, adding that she was ‘not in control of my charity’ having ‘put the control in the hands of a lawyer’.  

A probe into Fashion for Relief was opened by the commission in 2021, with the charity dissolved and removed from the register of charities last year.

It had been set up with the aim of uniting the fashion industry to relieve poverty and advance health and education, by making grants to other organisations and giving resources towards global disasters.

It hosted fundraising events to generate income, including in Cannes and London.

The regulator’s inquiry found that, between April 2016 and July 2022, 8.5% of the charity’s overall expenditure was on charitable grants.

The probe saw no evidence that trustees took action to ensure fundraising methods were in the charity’s best interests, or that the money it spent was reasonable relative to the income it generated.

It also said it found some fundraising expenditure to be misconduct or mismanagement by the charity’s trustees.

She pulled her dark tresses up into a тιԍнт ponytail with plait and worked the camera like an absolute pro

This included a 14,800 euro (£12,300) flight from London to Nice for transferring art and jewellery to a fundraising event in Cannes in 2018.

It also looked into the decision to spend 9,400 euros (£7,800) of charity funds on a three-night stay at a five-star H๏τel for Naomi.

Last year the supermodel said she failed in her duties as a trustee and ‘may not have been as actively engaged in the charity’s day-to-day operations as she should have been’.

But she maintained she had not engaged in any financial misconduct or misused the charity during its tumultuous nine years.